International Production and Trade Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

International Production and Trade - Essay Example As a result of this shift, the United States and much of Western Europe aligned itself with a free market capitalist system whereas the Soviet Union and many parts of the remainder of the world aligned themselves with socialist communism. As a result of this bipolar powershift, the capitalist nations throughout the world realize that one of the only ways to ensure that wealth generation and sustained growth could proliferate was by engaging in a system of capitalism that prized reductions in trade barriers and liberalize nations in trade. The authors further specify the fact that this desire to reduce trade barriers and liberalize trade was ultimately the impetus which helps to give rise to such global entities as GATT, WTO, and the World Bank. Yet rather than each and every nation throughout the world integrating their economies and seeking to provide goods and services with little to no trade barriers, a somewhat different dynamic has been realized. As such, the difference between theory and practice is denoted by the authors with respect to the way in which different trade blocs and trade alliances have developed between the regions and entities throughout the globe. As such, whereas the world might have been previously defined based upon religion and/or ideology, nationality, ethnicity, or any other litany of different qualifiers, the modern world has largely been defined with regards to which nations agreed to a level of unimpeded trade. What this has ultimately affected is a situation through which the world has come to be redefined based upon trade and not based upon many of the other qualifications that had previously constrained and defined the way in which nations have interacted historically. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, this particular trend has only been increasing as more and more nations throughout the globe seek to develop their own trade blocs and alliances in something of a macro form of protectionism. Evidence of this can of course be seen with regards to the way in which the EU, NAFTA, and ASEAN treaties now exists which helped to promote trans regional trade and block the advances of true international liberalism that might otherwise helped to differentiate and grow these respective economies. As a result of this particular approach, the authors discuss the way in which this dynamic shift has encouraged specialization with regards to different industries and regions/economies. Moreover, as well has been generated and regions of the world have come to supply the raw material for finished goods and services in other parts of the world, the authors note the fact that many individuals view this as something of a neo-mercantilist system. Although this is not quite the case, the comparisons are nonetheless existence and should not be dismissed out of hand. As the more wealthy nations, represented by powerful trade alliances and blocs are able to outsource their unskilled labor and raw material extraction to poore r nations, the benefits of these inputs are realized on both entities. Whereas the neo-mercantilist would point to the fact that these nations are being taken advantage

Feudalsim :: European Europe History

Feudalsim During the Middle Ages, countries fought and argued for land and pride. The main goal of the leaders of these countries was global domination. With several countries fighting for one cause, there was no chance they would resolve their differences peacefully, often leading to wars and conflicts. Feudalism was the staple of European government. Although it served medieval statesmen well, the social structure was incredibly unbalanced, which was the main reason for its downfall. The creation of this form of government is believed by scientists to have been back in the ninth century, A... the institutions of feudalism gained accelerated organization in the ninth century ...@ (Bunsen 179). This states that the most influential countries and regions began to form during this time. AIts origins, however, were traced to the break up of centralization of the Roman Empire ...@ (Bunsen 179). This means that even before the feudal provinces began to develop, evidence of feudal societies was being thought up. When the Roman empire fell, it left many wealthy landowners spread throughout the European landscape. For every wealthy landowner there were many poorer, less prominent ex-roman citizens. AThey decided therefore to commend themselves to landlords, surrendering to a lord in return for safety and the right to farm the properties@ (Bunsen 179). This was the beginning of the feudal nations. Other provinces would evolve, but for the most part these were the more prominent countries. The children of the men who owned the land would inherit the land as well as any other property owned by their fathers. This tradition kept rich people rich and poor people poor. People who exchanged their land for protection were shielded from opposing enemies by knights, infantrymen and horsemen. "The vassal rendered to his lord certain services in addition to supplying his quota of armed knights " (Bishop 110). The primary defense for a lord was his knight. AThe knights formed the core of the lord=s household; many of them lived permanently within the castle walls and were fed and housed by him@ (Barbara 269). Knights that were given homage by their lords did not really need any land but were still paid in fiefs, which were stretches of land paid to whomever. AThese household knights did not need a grant of land on which to live, though they often received it all the same@ (Barbara 269). This showed the favoritism the lords and kings felt and expressed to upper class citizens.

Analyzing The Electoral College Essay

Introduction – There is not one perfect model for the electoral process. All of the varied electoral processes conducted around the world have some kind of flaw or problem. If there was a perfect electoral system, the world now would have been bereft of any concerns involving the electoral processes. The United States, for all of its advancement in thinking and its study and use of new knowledge in the field of analysis and social sciences, still is unable to define what a perfect electoral system is, and until now, the country is still bombarded with concerns about the possible inconsistencies and the presence of bias or unfairness during the electoral process. Two of the most common election problems include the general problems of the faulty electoral system in place in the country and the growing problem about the efficiency of the Electoral College. There must be some logic or some prevailing election custom or tradition that paved the way for the creation and constant use of the winner take all system, because if the people generally are not in favor of such a system, then how can the system of winner take all during elections take place in the US election system? For someone who thinks the winner take all makes sense to identify the rightful representation for the electorate, the system is the way to go and thinking of a new way which would replace the existing system of winner take all in the election is something that is not only arduous but is also impossible to implement in such a short period of time, considering the fact that elections does not even happen in an annual basis. Analyzing the electoral system and the Electoral College – There maybe some individuals and organizations as well who frown at the idea of the winner take all, while there may also be some people and some groups who believe that the election system and the Electoral College is on the right track by using the winner take all scheme during elections. For those who wants to venture deeper into this issue, the real issue is getting at the bottom of the concern that anti-winner take all scheme voices out, and weigh its relevance and significance vis-Ã  -vis the reasons that people put forward about how the existing winner takes all is a good style in the election process. In the analysis of the winner takes all scheme, those who may agree for its continuance may revert to the thinking that if it is happening and is allowed by almost everyone, then it is considered as socially acceptable and therefore generally something that is ok. The role and influence of the selected electors or members of the electoral college – The electoral college members which are selected representatives of the electorate of a particular state, holds an important role if there are any serious efforts towards the recreation and reconstruction of some of the election process in the country. Like political parties and interest groups, the Electoral College is a collection of individuals which holds an important power in their hands that can dictate the outcome of the process of leader-selection inside the US government for seats taken only by elected officials. Another important aspect to discuss when it comes to the analysis of the problem in the electoral process particularly in the Electoral College and the problem found in the winner take all scheme is the privilege being enjoyed by the members of the Electoral College. Â  For those who are wondering why even despite the presence of those who are arguing against the use of the winner takes all practice during election, the scheme is still in place, the reason behind it maybe the maintaining of the source of power and influence especially among the usual members of the Electoral College. Like any other groups to which important outcomes are dependent on, the groups of individuals forming the electoral college, like the congressmen and the senators, are also experiencing the perks of being placed in a position wherein there is a possibility that the candidates for local and national positions would court these members of the electoral college, resulting to favors and personal debts which electoral college members may find useful, even profitable. Because the winner takes all tradition rests heavily on the continued support for such practice by most of the members of the electoral college (who will have to make do without the ‘favors’ coming their way should the winner takes all scheme is removed), the members of the electoral college themselves might be guilty in undertaking conscious efforts to ensure that the public policy and public opinion at worst is apathetic to such practice. Another problem that haunts the Electoral College is the fact that many do not consider it as a true ally and feature of a country that exercises a democratic form of government. The bias can be seen on how representation through the Electoral College is highly dependent on the state population counted every 10 years by the national census agency of the country. The Electoral College, the electoral system and the winner-takes-all scheme: Is there a better way? – Considering that those who are lobbying for a change in some aspects of the electoral system, starting with the change in the Electoral College and the winner-takes-all scheme, the important question to face here is this: what are the changes needed to complete the election system facelift? So far, there are no groups or individuals who have a concrete solution that can be adopted and implemented so that the electoral system in the country should improve. There are lots of criticisms about the Electoral College and the winner-takes-all scheme, but so far, there are not as many solutions being put to light to replace the electoral features which maybe detrimental to the exercise of a democratic country. The only explanation is that these features are effectively in place even until today despite the criticisms is because they serve the ends of those who are powerful enough to initiate the changes should the faulty features become detrimental to their interests as well. For example, if the winner takes all scheme is indeed a breach of the ideals of the democratic country to exercise fair representation in local and national governance, why is it in place and being observed even until now? In place of the winner-takes-all scheme, others suggest the designing and use of more proportional voting methods that actually put in counting the real statistics of votes and not the collective rounding off of votes during the preliminaries allowing for the change in campaigning strategies, which shifts direction away from the real voters and more towards earning the favor of the members of the Electoral College. Conclusion – When the forefathers of the country first thought of giving the rest of the society the privilege of picking the one person or the set of persons who will be responsible for looking after the welfare of the rest of the society, they immediately established the foundation of a sound democracy. Unfortunately, the design of the ideal democracy did not end there. Until today, the people should not stop in pursuing the elimination of the aspects of democracy that is more detrimental that beneficial, and that includes the problems found in the electoral system. The people should take a pro-active stand in fixing the problems found in the electoral system. Those who are responsible for this particular aspect of social link and interaction should re-evaluate the essence of some of the aspects of the electoral system, like the features and design of the Electoral College. They should be capable of providing the public an unbiased assessment on how the Electoral College is still capable or is not already capable of meeting the ends for which it was created for in the first place. If the Electoral College is being manipulated to serve the best interest of a select few, then the electoral system as a whole is in jeopardy, and drastic actions leading to the formulation of solutions and better alternative should be clearly defined and be set in motion.

E Commerce Company An ( Non Indian ) E Business Company

Introduction: Flipkart is an (Non-Indian) E-commerce company founded in 2007 by two Indians, Sachin Bansal and Binny Bansal. Flipkart operates in India but it is a Singapore based company and is registered in Singapore. The reason behind this is that corporate tax is low in Singapore as compared to India. The company was started with initial investment of approx. $6000 USD in 2007 with two employees who are also the founder now has a staff of over 33000 people in 2015. Flipkart also owns an E-commerce MYNTRA which specially deals with fashion accessories. Moreover, the company also have their own logistics company Ekart, which helps them in delivers items fast to customers at lesser cost. Flipkart started a program named Seller hub in†¦show more content†¦For ex- Motorola and xiaomi smartphones (a Chinese mobile company) were sold in thousands of quantity within the minutes of its launch, only through flip kart site. †¢ The second most important feature that makes flip kart an interesting site is prepaid wallet feature; it is a prepaid instrument of paying money while purchasing online stuff on site. A shopper just has to add one-time payment of a certain value in their account and can do shopping multiple times, the corresponding amount will be deducted from the account. This feature is available only on flip kart site which makes it interesting site as compared to competitors. †¢ In order to increase the sales and to meet customer requirements the flip kart company started launching and selling their own smartphone tablet and wireless router. For ex- in year 2014 the company launched dig flip pro tablet and dig flip wireless router, which showed huge success in company sales. †¢ The other approach to attract the customers toward flip kart business is, the company moving toward the acquisition of other less popular e-commerce sites like chakpak, myntra, lets buy etc., this in turn helps the company to expand the customer reach in every sector of market. It makes it lot easier for customer to shop through e-commerce sites because all the small vendors and